Evidence first
A useful fact-check does not rely on confident wording alone. Kaval looks for corroborating sources, original reporting, fact-checking references, and contradictions before giving a verdict.
Use Kaval when a claim sounds important but the source is unclear. It checks whether a headline, forward, screenshot, or social post is backed by credible evidence before you repeat it.
A useful fact-check does not rely on confident wording alone. Kaval looks for corroborating sources, original reporting, fact-checking references, and contradictions before giving a verdict.
Online claims arrive as copied text, cropped screenshots, viral headlines, video captions, and family group messages. Kaval focuses on extracting the checkable claim before searching for evidence.
Some claims cannot be verified immediately. In those cases, the answer should say what is known, what is missing, and whether the safest move is to wait before sharing.
Share the headline, message, screenshot text, or social post you want checked.
Kaval identifies the main factual statement instead of checking vague reactions or opinions.
The answer weighs reputable sources, fact-checks, timelines, and missing evidence.
You get a practical label such as likely true, misleading, unsupported, scam risk, or needs more evidence.
No. Kaval is for triaging everyday claims quickly. For high-stakes questions, use it alongside original sources, official information, and professional reporting.
Yes. Send the screenshot with the claim attached to it. Kaval can check whether the content appears supported, outdated, edited, or missing context.
The safest answer is uncertainty. Kaval explains what is missing and recommends waiting before sharing the claim as true.